dc.contributor.author |
Buteera, Faustin |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-04T12:03:47Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-01-04T12:03:47Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Faustin Buteera (2021). Exploring public participation and level of engagement in solid waste management and control: a case of Kawaala Town Council, Uganda. In Asiimwe, Solomon (Ed). Compendium of Graduate Students’ Research Abstracts. Entebbe: Nkumba University Press. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-9970-694-00-6 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://pub.nkumbauniversity.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/123456789/414 |
|
dc.description |
The findings showed that solid waste generation in
Kawaala Town Council is very high characterized by paper boxes, plastic bottles, banana peels, and other
organic food waste, as well as polythene materials among
others. The study revealed that public participation in
solid waste management took several forms ranging from
waste collection, sorting, transportation, and waste
disposal. From the regression analysis on the roles of the
public in solid waste management, the results showed an
R Square value of 0.011 and Adjusted R Square value of
0.005, (R= 0.106, R2
= 0.011, P-value < 0.005) this
indicates that level of education was a significant
predictor of public participation in solid waste
management and contributed 10% of the variation of
participants’ understanding of the need for sorting waste.
A positive t- value of 9.364 with (P- value =0.00< 0.05)
indicates that a relationship exists between respondents
choice of a waste control strategy. However, selling of
plastics to recycling companies has been identified as a
viable waste control method in Kawaala as viewed from a
positive ß = 0.118. This means that the educated
individuals are more willing to sell waste to a recycling
company than merely participating in sorting and
collecting it. The challenges in waste management included: lack of
proper dumping sites, ignorance of some people of the
dangers of indiscriminate waste disposal, distant disposal
facilities, inadequate financing among others. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The term solid waste (SW) may be used to refer to
municipal waste and it can be defined as the waste in
solid-state generated by human activities in municipal
centers. This includes soil, debris, metal scrap, paper,
plastics such as (basins and cups), textiles and leather,
broken bottles, glass as well as electrical and electronic
equipment. It can be categorised into several groups. They
are residential (or household or domestic waste),
commercial, institutional, street sweeping, construction
and demolition, sanitation, and industrial wastes (Rush,
1999). Whereas municipal solid waste refers to solid
wastes from houses, streets and public places, shops,
offices, and hospitals, which are very often the
responsibility of municipal or other governmental
authorities (NEMA, 2007); solid waste from industrial
processes is generally not considered municipal. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Nkumba university press Entebbe. |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
;no. 258-262 |
|
dc.subject |
Solid Waste Management, |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Public participation, |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Level of stakeholder engagement, |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Solid Waste Management Challenges. |
en_US |
dc.title |
Exploring public participation and level of engagement in solid waste management and control |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
A case of Kawaala Town Council, Uganda |
en_US |
dc.type |
Book chapter |
en_US |